
During the summer of 2023, Luke Wenke was found guilty of violating the conditions of his supervised release by indirectly contacting his cyberstalking victim by emailing the victim’s business partner. He was sentenced to time served and 34 months of continued probation. Shortly thereafter, Wenke’s public defender filed an appeal on his behalf via the

USA v. Luke Wenke – District Court Judgment August 22nd, 2023 CASE #23-6964, DOC. #2 Categories: Luke Wenke, appeals, Court Documents: Judgments Tags: Buffalo, NY; conditions of supervised release, contact ban violations, cyberstalking, indirect contact, probation violations, unwanted contact, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Victim 1, violations of supervised release (VOSR)

After being found guilty of violating the conditions of his supervised release during the summer of 2023 by indirectly contacting his cyberstalking victim (via the victim’s business partner), Luke Wenke filed an appeal through the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City. The following documents pertain to that appeal, which was the

The following docket reports pertain to two appeals that Luke Wenke filed in his first cyberstalking case (1:22-cr-00035). The first docket report pertains to Wenke’s most recent appeal case (#25-1165), and the docket report below it pertains to his previous appeal case (#23-6964). USA v. Luke Wenke – Docket Report Appeal Case #25-1165 USA v.

In 2023, Luke Wenke was found guilty of violating the terms of his federal supervised release by indirectly contacting his cyberstalking victim, “Victim 1,” via an email to the victim’s business associate. The PDF viewer below contains two transcripts (Docs. #84 & #85) featuring word-for-word accounts of what was said during Wenke’s sentencing proceedings, which

In December 2023, Luke Wenke was released from jail on an ankle monitor while awaiting sentencing for a federal probation violation charge that he had pleaded guilty to the previous month. In exchange for Wenke’s guilty plea, the judge had dropped four other probation violation charges, all of which were for contacting victims in violation